User talk:Dirko
From Snoutslouts
(Created page with '== Naming conventions == Hi Dirko I think that we will need to agree a standard way of naming players. For example, Cornes has three players who played for GFC. Obviously Gr…') |
(naming Match pages) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[User:Ranga|Ranga]] 23:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Ranga|Ranga]] 23:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Naming Individual Matches == | ||
| + | Do you think it would make more sense to have the article page for a particular Round named after the Round and year (like they do on Blueseum) rather than the calendar date, which means little to a casual reader? Thus the game on 7 May 1921 would be on a page called [[Round 1 1921]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Ranga|Ranga]] 12:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:25, 13 April 2010
Naming conventions
Hi Dirko
I think that we will need to agree a standard way of naming players.
For example, Cornes has three players who played for GFC. Obviously Graham is the one with the most interest for Glenelg fans, but sooner or later we will be including the sons in the list and just the surname wont separate them.
I suggest we use christian and surnames, and if there are multiple players with the same name then we include middle initials. This is what Blueseum does. If we have any where the names are absolutely identical we can list the more prolific player and have a link at the top to the "lesser" player's page. How does that sound?
Ranga 23:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Naming Individual Matches
Do you think it would make more sense to have the article page for a particular Round named after the Round and year (like they do on Blueseum) rather than the calendar date, which means little to a casual reader? Thus the game on 7 May 1921 would be on a page called Round 1 1921.
Ranga 12:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
