User talk:Ranga
From Snoutslouts
(Difference between revisions)
(response re Seasons) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Locker Room == | ||
Hi Pudgey, | Hi Pudgey, | ||
| Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
Dirko | Dirko | ||
| - | + | == Seasons == | |
Hi Mr Ranga | Hi Mr Ranga | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
[[User:Dirko|Dirko]] 06:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Dirko|Dirko]] 06:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Yes I also thought along those lines when I was typing that info in. I have started looking at some old papers at the State Library and I can assure you that there is no way we will get a game-by-game record on here short of a work-for-the-dole project (joke). | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: So I am thinking that each season will probably get a summary of what happened and if we know of any significant events/games then we can summarise those. 1921 obviously would get a bit extra summary compared to some, it being the first League year. For individual matches we can use the system you have started with those 2006 match reports. One thing that bothers me with using a name like [[06.05.2006]] is that dates dont list very well in any summary page like the <nowiki>[[Category: Match Reports]]</nowiki>. If we want to change the format of the page names it would be best to do it now before we go too far. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Oh and I have a couple of match reports from 1921 to type up once I decipher the shocking quality print you get from microfische. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::[[User:Ranga|Ranga]] 07:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:53, 13 April 2010
Locker Room
Hi Pudgey,
I have left a message on the main page in the Locker Room. Check it out and have a look on what I did and you'll get the drift.
Cheers
Dirko
Seasons
Hi Mr Ranga
Great stuff with the articles on 1921. Just a thought, as that theme will be continued on for all seasons, would it be more beneficial to have another area for them.
I can just see when in ten years time, we reach the 70's etc, and we have access to heaps and heaps of stuff, those reports etc will dominate the game scores etc.
Perhaps a section call "Seasons: In word"
and then have 1921, with all the articles, 1922 etc and so forth.
And then when we get pictures enabled start another one "Seasons: In Pictures" etc.
Cheers
Dirko 06:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes I also thought along those lines when I was typing that info in. I have started looking at some old papers at the State Library and I can assure you that there is no way we will get a game-by-game record on here short of a work-for-the-dole project (joke).
- So I am thinking that each season will probably get a summary of what happened and if we know of any significant events/games then we can summarise those. 1921 obviously would get a bit extra summary compared to some, it being the first League year. For individual matches we can use the system you have started with those 2006 match reports. One thing that bothers me with using a name like 06.05.2006 is that dates dont list very well in any summary page like the [[Category: Match Reports]]. If we want to change the format of the page names it would be best to do it now before we go too far.
- Oh and I have a couple of match reports from 1921 to type up once I decipher the shocking quality print you get from microfische.
- Ranga 07:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
