Category talk:Players
From Snoutslouts
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with 'Pudgey. Question. With this new Players Category, shouldn't the players appear under the letters of their Surname not their first name as that's what they're sorted on, on the ma…') |
(response) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Pudgey. Question. With this new Players Category, shouldn't the players appear under the letters of their Surname not their first name as that's what they're sorted on, on the main Players page? [[User:Dirko|Dirko]] 12:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | Pudgey. Question. With this new Players Category, shouldn't the players appear under the letters of their Surname not their first name as that's what they're sorted on, on the main Players page? [[User:Dirko|Dirko]] 12:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :LOL that's why we are in "test" phase! Yes you're correct and there must be a way to force the sort by surname. I was only doing enough of the Categories to see if they could/should replace the index pages, or whether we need both. I will add sorting to the list of things to research (my head is still sore from trying to research templates). [[User:Ranga|Ranga]] 21:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:44, 18 March 2010
Pudgey. Question. With this new Players Category, shouldn't the players appear under the letters of their Surname not their first name as that's what they're sorted on, on the main Players page? Dirko 12:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- LOL that's why we are in "test" phase! Yes you're correct and there must be a way to force the sort by surname. I was only doing enough of the Categories to see if they could/should replace the index pages, or whether we need both. I will add sorting to the list of things to research (my head is still sore from trying to research templates). Ranga 21:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)