Talk:1942
From Snoutslouts
(Difference between revisions)
(Wartime details request) |
(→Wartime Competition) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Also there were some funny things done in terms of "games played" for those who served in the Armed Forces - I will see if I can locate the Whimpress article that deals with it. [[User:Ranga|Ranga]] 23:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC) | Also there were some funny things done in terms of "games played" for those who served in the Armed Forces - I will see if I can locate the Whimpress article that deals with it. [[User:Ranga|Ranga]] 23:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, this raises the question about how we treat Glenelg-West games. It is a "hot topic" amongst SANFL historians as to whether these games should be included in official games/goals totals or not. Over the years many varied approaches have been used, some publications have given extra games to those who were away on service which is what you are thinking of Ranga. I too remember that very good Whipress article - I think it is on full points footy. | ||
| + | [[User:Ecky|Ecky]] 01:57, 11 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:57, 11 March 2010
Wartime Competition
Do we have details of the combined teams games?
Also there were some funny things done in terms of "games played" for those who served in the Armed Forces - I will see if I can locate the Whimpress article that deals with it. Ranga 23:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Yes, this raises the question about how we treat Glenelg-West games. It is a "hot topic" amongst SANFL historians as to whether these games should be included in official games/goals totals or not. Over the years many varied approaches have been used, some publications have given extra games to those who were away on service which is what you are thinking of Ranga. I too remember that very good Whipress article - I think it is on full points footy.
Ecky 01:57, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
